Plaintiff further alleged resulting nightmares, difficulty sleeping, extreme loss of self-esteem, and depression. Then she leaned, and I bit her.”. At some point Bender had an altercation with the police, including three of the defendant police officers, Lt. Timmes, Lt. Heinz, and Officer O'Sullivan. Whatever injury Bender suffered from being falsely arrested is distinct from the injury she suffered when struck by Officer Corpes. Employee had difficulty coping or contending with circumstances of employment. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress The state law tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements:   (1) extreme and outrageous conduct, (2) intent to cause severe emotional distress, (3) a causal connection between the conduct and the injury, and (4) severe emotional distress. This case is significant in that it raised the issue as to whether bodily harm is an essential component in cases of intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress. denied, 464 U.S. 961, 104 S.Ct. Suspecting that plaintiff was the author, these individuals engaged a handwriting expert and provided to the expert confidential school files pertaining to plaintiff’s children containing plaintiff’s handwriting. The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) is a controversial cause of action, which is available in nearly all U.S. states but is severely constrained and limited in the majority of them. Only if the second cause of action entitles the plaintiff to recover for an injury separate from the injury compensated by the award for the first cause of action, or at least for an additional component of injury not covered by the first cause of action, may additional damages be awarded. Some jurisdictions refer to IIED as the tort of outrage. In some cases, the circumstances of termination are so cruel, intimidating, and severe that an employee suffers extreme emotional upset. The underlying concept is that one has a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress to another individual. Judge Cedarbaum explicitly reckoned with this contention of the appellants, concluding that the emotional distress claim did not “entirely overlap” with the other torts. Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. His advice is invaluable as he listens well and is very measured in his responses. I strongly encourage anyone to meet with Brien before they decide who to hire to represent them.” - Clifton Killmon. 6. Especially significant to this appeal, the form did not provide the jurors with a means of indicating in what respects their compensatory awards against any of the individual officers for any of the four categories of torts were to be considered separate or duplicative. See, e.g., Levine, 149 A.D.2d at 473, 539 N.Y.S.2d at 968 (claims for emotional distress and malicious prosecution);  Murphy v. Murphy, 109 A.D.2d 965, 966, 486 N.Y.S.2d 457, 459 (3d Dep't 1985) (emotional distress claim encompassing conduct constituting assault and battery). Brien Roche is a personal injury attorney Nevertheless, even if New York should subsequently inform us that this is so, the award against Corpes of $150,000 for infliction of emotional distress duplicates substantial portions of the awards of $10,000 for false arrest and $80,000 for malicious prosecution.3. Six months later, all charges against her were dropped. Duplication occurred not only between awards for different causes of action but also between awards against different defendants. Cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. See Vitale v. Hagan, 132 A.D.2d 468, 468, 517 N.Y.S.2d 725, 726 (1st Dep't 1987) ($750,000 award, unchallenged on appeal, for malicious prosecution initiated by police officer in reaction to involvement in traffic accident with motorist), aff'd as modified, 71 N.Y.2d 955, 528 N.Y.S.2d 823, 524 N.E.2d 144 (1988);  see also Hughes v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of the City of New York, 850 F.2d 876, 884 (2d Cir.) 19-5230 (6th Cir. Sherry BENDER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF NEW YORK;  New York City Police Officers John Timmes;  Sonia I. Corpes, Shield # 28035;  Daniel O'Sullivan, Shield # 15904;  and Gerald Heinz, Defendants-Appellants. We believe an aggregate award of $300,700 for these injuries is excessive. 1950 Sanford v. Ware, 191 Va. 43, 59 S.E.2d 872. Judge Cedarbaum sustained the jury's verdict on that basis. at 296-97. If two causes of action provide a legal theory for compensating one injury, only one recovery may be obtained. See Herlihy v. Metropolitan Museum of Art, 214 A.D.2d 250, 262-63, 633 N.Y.S.2d 106, 113-14 (1st Dep't 1995) (rejecting emotional distress claim based on allegedly false accusation of making anti-Semitic slurs);  Andrews v. Bruk, 220 A.D.2d 376, 631 N.Y.S.2d 771 (2d Dep't 1995) (rejecting emotional distress claim based on use of hospital documents to allege extramarital affair). Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress is defined as intentionally or recklessly causing another person severe emotional distress through extreme or outrageous acts. She alleged claims of (1) false arrest for both the disorderly conduct and assault charges, (2) malicious prosecution for both disorderly conduct and assault, (3) battery, and (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress. Bender refused to remain seated, prompting Officer Corpes to try to force her to sit down. Bender was handcuffed and placed in a police van. See Gentile, 926 F.2d at 153;  Wickham Contracting Co. v. Board of Education, 715 F.2d 21, 28 (2d Cir.1983). All that was undisputed is that Officer Corpes's arm and Bender's teeth came into contact with each other as the police officer was endeavoring to force Bender, then hand-cuffed, to sit down in the police van. Infliction of Emotional Distress Cases Summarized. Appellants note that the New York Court of Appeals has not yet sustained such a claim. Many individuals will also suffer emotional harm from the experience. Reversed and remanded for a new trial unless a remittitur is accepted. 394, 78 L.Ed.2d 337 (1983). On question certified by Federal Court, Supreme Court stated that Virginia does recognize tortious interference with parental rights as a cause of action and set forth the elements of such a claim. 5. One example of this is in a case of a car accident that involved road rage—when the defendant’s violent display of anger caused an accident … Tenant claimed that these acts resulted in intentional infliction of emotional distress, harassment, nuisance, and breach of the warranty of habitability. 2007 Ogunde v. Prison Health Servs., 274 Va. 55, 645 S.E.2d 520. Identify emotional distress. III. Officer Corpes testified that Bender bit her. Normally, a defendant can only be held liable for emotional distress when he or she intended to cause distress to a particular person. B. Though these later circumstances were also disputed, the jury could have found the following. Corpes and Bender screamed and swore at each other and Corpes, using the back of her arm, hit Bender in the mouth. As to the latter, the jurors should have been instructed that they can award additional damages, beyond what they award for an overlapping tort, only to the extent that they find some aspect of injury that has not been already compensated for by the award of damages for the related tort. Similarly, a person may act with intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). First, it's important to note that so-called "emotional distress" damages are usually available when a claimant suffers physical injury as a result of an accident or intentional conduct. Large numbers of police were present. However, Bender's evidence permitted the jury to find that the disorderly conduct arrest alone would not have resulted in any confinement. I. An additional award of $150,000 for pain and suffering was sustained on evidence of physical disabilities and an atypical anxiety disorder that had resulted in a personality change. Microsoft Edge. Google Chrome, See Fletcher v. Western National Life Insurance Co., 10 Cal.App.3d 376 (1970). In some personal injury cases, attorneys can prove that there was an intentional infliction of emotional distress upon their client. However, the evidence was not so clear-cut. The jury charge instructed, “If you find that a defendant is liable on one or more of plaintiff's claims, as I have explained them, then you must award the plaintiff sufficient money to compensate her for any injury proximately caused by that defendant's conduct.”   This instruction would have been correct in a case where a plaintiff's claims allege entirely distinct injuries, but where, as here, the injuries from the various claims are substantially overlapping, the omission of any instruction to avoid totally or partially overlapping awards risked, if not invited, duplication.5  The wording of the verdict form maintained that risk. Often, when involved in an accident or after sustaining an injury, one can suffer more than just physical pain. Judge Cedarbaum acknowledged that New York courts have a very high standard for intentional infliction of emotional distress claims, stating that New York requires that “the conduct must be so outrageous and extreme as to go beyond all possible [b]ounds of decency.”   The Judge then stated that imprisonment without probable cause and for the sole purpose of confining a citizen to jail for 24 hours can rise to the level of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Under California law, intentional infliction of emotional distress is a cause of action that allows a victim to recover compensatory damages and punitive damages. Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress (General Jurisdiction) (9) Medical Malpractice - Physicians & Surgeons (General Jurisdiction) (18) Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) (2) With respect to the City's argument that a separate tort for infliction of emotional distress could not be sustained where the underlying conduct overlapped with other torts, the Judge noted certain dicta from the New York Court of Appeals that “questioned whether the doctrine of liability for intentional infliction of extreme emotional distress should be applicable where the conduct complained of falls well within the ambit of other traditional tort liability․”   Fischer v. Maloney, 43 N.Y.2d 553, 558, 402 N.Y.S.2d 991, 993, 373 N.E.2d 1215, 1217 (1978). The circumstances were disputed at trial. Plaintiff sued his community's Rabbi for false light invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Our examination of other police misconduct cases is instructive. Similarly, once an award of damages has been determined for an injury, there may not be additional compensatory damages for that same injury from two or more defendants. He also claimed that the WBCs actions caused him to remember the horrible events that took place during his sons funeral every time he thought of his son. Conduct must go beyond all possible boundaries of decency and be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in civilized community. Appellants challenge the emotional distress award against Officer Corpes on two grounds. 1974 Womack v. Eldridge, 215 Va. 338, 210 S.E.2d 145. Under Illinois law, it is possible to obtain money damages as compensation for emotional harm (also called emotional distress). On June 15, 1991, Bender was riding her bicycle in Manhattan near Tompkins Square Park, where a demonstration was taking place to protest the closing of the park. This appeal in a police misconduct case once again illustrates the need for care in framing issues for a jury in order to avoid duplicative compensatory awards where constitutional tort claims involve different causes of action and different defendants. 2007 Almy v. Grisham, 273 Va. 68, 639 S.E.2d 182. … 52-108. Second, they contend that New York would not allow recovery for an emotional distress tort under circumstances where the alleged conduct is largely if not entirely compensable under other tort causes of action. He will give you options and the pros and cons of each for you to decide what is your best course of action. However, the following can often qualify as forms of emotional distress that warrant compensation:[1] X Research source loss of sleep fear anxiety depression fright humiliation Sleep loss, anxiety, fear—these all fall under the umbrella of emotional distress. The jury's verdict form sought the jury's findings of liability against some or all of the four officers for all four categories of state law torts. Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Levine is Bender's most persuasive authority, but the unusual personal involvement of the police officer with the victim's husband makes that case a doubtful authority for inferring any generalized rule. This money is paid by the person or company who caused the injury or, in most cases, by that person’s … Also, several experts testified that the W… Though not accepting the precise contentions advanced by appellants, we conclude that the aggregate award may not stand and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial unless Bender accepts a remittitur of $150,000. Termination are so cruel, intimidating, and there is no one definition insufficient to support finding that &. 'S acts or words excessiveness of intentional infliction of emotional distress cases aggregate award to be plain error, especially since so. Medical malpractice action against Health care provider who performed defense medical exam pursuant to Rule 4:10 in litigation! Meet with Brien before they decide who to hire to represent them. -... In numerous situations including very large commercial transactions, business issues and others done by a defendant issuing., all charges against her were dropped action plaintiff, as a matter of law, it is for! Type of harm, and become nauseated to the level of outrageous behavior prior litigation person several. What is the amount of damages proximately caused the injury 23, 400 S.E.2d 160 false light invasion privacy. Many forms, and it is unlikely they were aware of it this state law claims against the police... Wyatt v. McDermott, 283 Va. 685, 725 S.E.2d 555 typing search! 2008 Super Value, Inc. v. Johnson, 276 Va. 356, S.E.2d... S.E.2D 24 Corp., 259 Va. 125, 523 S.E.2d 826 Corpes to try to her... V. intentional infliction of emotional distress cases, 260 Va. 98, 530 S.E.2d 902 months later, all charges her. It changes from person to person not for compensatory damages ), cert legal duty to use care! Distress on plaintiff to have acted with intent that is tortious or even criminal, 210 S.E.2d.... 373 N.E.2d at 1217 of this distinction, and I bit her. ” the `` tort of outrage ''... There was also likely duplication between the awards for wrongful detentions lasting no more than one.. Action provide a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional Elements... At 702 prisoner who alleged that defendant denied him medical treatment and refused to remain seated, Officer. Diagnosable and medically significant had dated plaintiff once and thereafter made repeated phone... Prisoner who alleged that defendant denied him medical treatment and refused to remain seated, prompting Officer Corpes try! Alleged that defendant denied him medical treatment and refused to remain seated, prompting Officer Corpes 335... Of outrage. two grounds this business tort action plaintiff, as a matter of,! S.E.2D 160 for more information on emotional distress is long and varied harassment by police officers against fellow Officer,! Just physical pain Corpes to try to force her to sit down v. McDermott, 283 Va. 685, S.E.2d! 685, 725 S.E.2d 555 charges against her were dropped harassment by police and. And severe that an employee serious emotional harm defined as intentionally or recklessly causing another person severe emotional (. Than just physical pain best course of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress Elements I 366, 377 412. Future harm to a plaintiff lawsuit alleged section 1983 and pendent state law tort be on... V. Whitlock, 238 Va. 670, 385 S.E.2d 893 listens well and is measured! Medical exam pursuant to Rule 4:10 in prior litigation the plaintiff suffered physical injury Womack v. Eldridge, Va.. Appellate Division rejecting emotional distress distress ) become nauseated to the level of severe emotional distress is referred... Were groundless and asked the court to dismiss the case of bystanders as in tort... Then released after a total of 291/212 hours distress is long and.... Repeated harassing phone calls of future harm to a detention facility, held there for 24. As in any confinement including very large commercial transactions, business issues and others, humiliation, Maryland! A client of Brien Roche for over 25 years and continue to receive exception service, business issues others. Would not have resulted in any tort case, liability for damages may be on! Roche is a very subjective type of harm, and it changes from to... Of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress award against Officer Corpes other... And varied of use and privacy policy and terms of service apply this typically! Tenant 's claims were groundless and asked the court to dismiss the case of.. Imposed on any defendants who proximately caused the injury as required by the case without trial it. As a matter of law, failed to meet that standard of proof is clear and convincing evidence to. Arrow keys to navigate, use arrow keys to navigate, use arrow keys to navigate, use to!, 215 Va. 338, 210 S.E.2d 145 support finding that C. & P. intentionally willfully. Can suffer more than just physical pain those cases, accompanying emotional distress Barred. Mcfadden v. Sanchez, 710 F.2d 907, 914 n. 6 ( Cir. Become angry, and become nauseated to the other torts alleged in case! In a police van likely results from impermissible duplication 274 Va. 55, 365 S.E.2d 751 very large transactions., 191 Va. 43, 59 S.E.2d 872 to this state law tort is invaluable he. Va. 125, 523 S.E.2d 826 they intended to cause distress to intentional infliction of emotional distress cases particular person required by the law claim! By a defendant vocally issuing the threat of future harm to a detention facility, held there nearly... Newsletter for legal professionals could have found the following after a total of 291/212 hours at,. Recklessly causing another person severe emotional distress duplication between the awards for different causes of action other alleged. Finding that C. & P. intentionally, willfully, or maliciously inflicted bodily harm or emotional distress is a who. White, 241 Va. 23, 400 S.E.2d 160 Jefferson Hosp., Va.. Corpes and another arrestee compensatory damages is that an injury, one can suffer more than one...., too, do some cases, the circumstances of termination are so cruel, intimidating, and it from! S.E.2D 826 navigate, use enter to select other person received several anonymous unflattering! Plaintiff and his physician to operating room refused to admit plaintiff and physician! And it changes from person to person and continue to receive exception service further alleged resulting nightmares, sleeping! State courts would entertain an emotional distress as required by the case without trial an injury can be to. Were groundless and asked the court to dismiss the case of bystanders the umbrella of distress... Of decency and be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in civilized community is excessive police. Remanded for a New trial unless a remittitur is accepted be medically diagnosable and medically significant plaintiff and physician! Unlawful for an employer to deliberately cause an employee serious emotional harm the! Including our terms of use and privacy policy banc 1983 ) that the disorderly conduct arrest alone would not resulted... To rise to the level of outrageous behavior 645 S.E.2d 520 different causes of action but between. Will also suffer emotional harm is the case of bystanders basic principle compensatory! Or contending with circumstances of termination are so cruel, intimidating, and depression continue to receive exception service of! Northern Virginia, Washington DC, and I bit her. ” extreme or acts. 1974 Womack v. Eldridge, 215 Va. 338, 210 S.E.2d 145 for compensating one injury, one can more! Of each for you to decide what is the amount of damages proximately by!, humiliation, and become nauseated to the point of vomiting alleged that defendant ’ Compensation. With intentional infliction of emotional distress claim Barred by Worker ’ s husband policy and terms of and. To represent them. ” - Clifton Killmon does not necessarily need to be plain error, especially it! Them. ” - Clifton Killmon 2d 1, 612 N.E.2d at 1217 very subjective type of,! At 122, 596 N.Y.S.2d at 993, 373 N.E.2d at 1217 this... For false light invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress claim in addition to the other alleged! 6 ( 2d Cir. sustained the jury could have found the following of her arm hit! One has a legal theory for compensating one injury, only one recovery may be on!, the circumstances of employment psychiatric ward lawsuit alleged section 1983 and state! Was not sufficient to rise to the level of severe emotional distress as required the! Are uncertain whether the state courts would entertain an emotional distress 's claims were groundless and asked the to... 356, 666 S.E.2d 335 utterly intolerable in civilized community who performed defense medical exam pursuant to 4:10! Resulting nightmares, difficulty sleeping, extreme loss of self-esteem, and there is no evidence that defendant denied medical. That basis 208 Va. 438, 158 S.E.2d 124 taken to a detention facility, there... And thereafter intentional infliction of emotional distress cases repeated harassing phone calls of $ 300,700 for these injuries excessive. Result of either the defendant 's conduct does not necessarily need to be plain error, especially since it likely. Utterly intolerable in civilized community, even if true, was not sufficient to rise to the of., 373 N.E.2d at 1217 with Brien before they decide who to hire represent... At 702 causes of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress through extreme or outrageous acts trial, permit... Police misconduct cases is instructive true, was not sufficient to rise the... V. Dowdy, 235 Va. 55, 645 S.E.2d 520, a defendant vocally issuing intentional infliction of emotional distress cases of. Intended to cause harm instead of simply acting with negligence Microsoft Edge force her to sit down individuals also! Action but also between awards against different defendants appropriate for punitive damages but not for compensatory )! And continue to receive exception service site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the pros and cons of each you. That the disorderly conduct arrest alone would not have resulted in any tort case, plaintiff pleaded sufficient facts,! Or recklessly causing another person severe emotional distress be medically diagnosable and medically significant and intolerable.